
Here's the difference between the imbecile and me... I read an article and if I don't agree with it, well, there's not a whole lot I can do about it. It says what it says. Lying about it or misquoting it doesn't change it into something that I agree with or something that helps my argument. I'll just Google the subject until I find something that I agree with or helps my argument. The imbecile will actually quote an article that doesn't prove his argument in the slightest. Or he'll either lie about what the article says or try to twist it. In Mark's tiny mind, he thinks nobody will notice. His name is Mark D. Curran... does the "D" stand for "Denial"? Despite the fact that absolutely nobody agrees with him, he continues to argue the same points over and over regardless of how many times he's been proven wrong. Is that indicative of a normal, healthy mental state? A psychiatrist would have a field day with this imbecile. Well at least his blog is closed down now. I guess my mission to debunk the imbecile is accomplished!